Parliamentary Service Commissioner’s Direction 2014
made under subsection 15(6) of the
Parliamentary Service Act 1999
Dated 23 December 2014
John Lloyd PSM
Parliamentary Service Commissioner
Contents
Part 1—Preliminary
1 Name of Direction
2 Authority
3 Commencement
4 Replacement/revocation of previous Direction
Part 2—Secretary handling of suspected Code of Conduct breaches
1 Purpose of Direction
2 Application to former Parliamentary Service employees
3 Employee must be informed that a determination is being considered
4 Employee must be informed before a sanction is imposed
5 Person making determination to be independent and unbiased
6 Determination process to be informal
7 Record of determination and sanctions
Part 1—Preliminary
1 Name of Direction
This Direction is the Parliamentary Service Commissioner’s Direction 2014.
2 Authority
This Direction is made under subsection 15(6) of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999 (the Act).
3 Commencement
This Direction will commence on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.
4 Revocation of previous directions
This Direction revokes the Parliamentary Service Commissioner’s Direction 2000/1.
Part 2—Secretary handling of suspected Code of Conduct breaches
The purpose of this Direction is to set out the basic procedural requirements that must be complied with by the procedures established by a Secretary under subsection 15 (3) of the Act for:
(a) determining whether a Parliamentary Service employee, or a former Parliamentary Service employee, in the Department has breached the Code of Conduct; and
(b) determining what sanction, if any, should be imposed on a Parliamentary Service employee for a breach of the Code of Conduct.
Note: The requirements set out in this Direction and the procedures established under subsection 15 (3) of the Act apply only in relation to a suspected breach of the Code of Conduct by a Parliamentary Service employee, or former Parliamentary Service employee, in respect of which a determination may be made. Not all suspected breaches of the Code of Conduct need to be dealt with by way of a determination. In particular circumstances, another way of dealing with a suspected breach of the Code of Conduct may be more appropriate. (See also clause 52 of Parliamentary Service Determination 2013.)
2 Application to former Parliamentary Service employees
(1) In this Direction, unless the contrary intention appears, a reference to a Parliamentary Service employee in a Department includes a reference to a former Parliamentary Service employee who is suspected of having breached the Code of Conduct while an employee in the Department.
(2) Subparagraph 3(a)(ii) and clause 4 do not apply in relation to a former employee.
3 Employee must be informed that a determination is being considered
A determination may not be made in relation to a suspected breach of the Code of Conduct by a Parliamentary Service employee unless reasonable steps have been taken to:
(a) inform the employee of:
(i) the details of the suspected breach (including any subsequent variation of those details); and
(ii) the sanctions that may be imposed on the employee under subsection 15 (1) of the Act; and
(b) give the employee a reasonable opportunity to make a statement in relation to the suspected breach.
4 Employee must be informed before a sanction is imposed
If a determination is made that a Parliamentary Service employee has breached the Code of Conduct, a sanction may not be imposed unless reasonable steps have been taken to:
(a) inform the employee of:
(i) the determination; and
(ii) the sanction or sanctions that are under consideration; and
(iii) the factors that are under consideration in determining any sanction to be imposed; and
(b) give the employee a reasonable opportunity to make a statement in relation to sanctions under consideration.
5 Person making determination to be independent and unbiased
A Secretary must take reasonable steps to ensure that:
(a) the person who determines whether a Parliamentary Service employee has breached the Code of Conduct is, and appears to be, independent and unbiased; and
(b) the person who determines any sanction to be imposed is, and appears to be, independent and unbiased.
6 Determination process to be informal
The process for determining whether a Parliamentary Service employee has breached the Code of Conduct must be carried out with as little formality and as much expedition as a proper consideration of the matter allows.
7 Record of determination and sanctions
If a determination is made in relation to a suspected breach of the Code of Conduct by a Parliamentary Service employee, a written record must be made of:
(a) the suspected breach; and
(b) the determination; and
(c) any sanctions imposed as a result of a determination that the employee breached the Code of Conduct; and
(d) if a statement of reasons was given to the employee—the statement of reasons.
Note: The Archives Act 1983 applies to a record made under this clause.