Customs (Extensions of Time and Non‑cooperation) Direction 2015
Customs Act 1901
I, CHRISTOPHER PYNE, Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science, make this direction under subsection 269TA(1) of the Customs Act 1901.
Dated 30 October 2015
CHRISTOPHER PYNE
___________________________________________
CHRISTOPHER PYNE
Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science
This Direction is the Customs (Extensions of Time and Non‑cooperation) Direction 2015.
2. Authority
a) This Direction is made under subsection 269TA(1) of the Act.
b) This Direction has the purpose of directing the Commissioner in relation to:
3. Commencement
This Direction commences on commencement of Schedule 1 of the Customs Amendment (Anti-Dumping Measures) Act (No.1) 2015.
4. Definitions
In this Direction:
Act means the Customs Act 1901.
case means an investigation, review or inquiry under Part XVB of the Act.
Commissioner means the Commissioner of the Anti-Dumping Commission.
entity or entities have the same meaning as ‘entities’ (in the singular for entity) given under subsection 269TAACA(2) of the Act.
interested party has the same meaning as ‘interested party’ under subsection 269T(1) of the Act.
key aspect means the making, by the Commissioner, of a preliminary affirmative determination, a statement of essential facts, a report relating to the termination of a case, or a report to the Minister.
legislated period means a timeframe specified, determined or prescribed for submitting any kind of response relating to any case, including the period specified in the Commissioner’s notice or other correspondence to an interested party in any case.
non-cooperative entity means an entity that the Commissioner is satisfied has either not provided information the Commissioner considers relevant to a case within a period the Commissioner considers reasonable, or has significantly impeded the case.
response means any document or thing provided to the Commissioner in relation to any case, including submissions, information or answers to the questions in questionnaires.
uncooperative exporter has the same meaning as ‘uncooperative exporter’ under section 269T of the Act.
PART 2 - DIRECTIONS
5. Extensions of time – sections 269TC and 269SMG
a) When the Commissioner is:
the Commissioner must:
b) When the Commissioner is considering any reasons provided to support the request by any interested parties under 5(a)(i)(3) or (ii)(3), the Commissioner must have regard to whether:
6. Insufficient responses – section 296SMG
a) If:
then the Commissioner should notify that party of the deficiencies and request that they be addressed in a further response within a reasonable timeframe specified by the Commissioner.
b) If:
then the Commissioner will notify the party of this view as soon as practicable.
Note: In these circumstances the Commissioner is not, required to provide the interested party with any further extension of time and is not precluded from being satisfied that the party has significantly impeded an investigation for the purposes of subsection 269T(1) or section 269TAACA.
7. Considering late responses
a) If a response has been received by the Commissioner outside the legislated period, the Commissioner must, when determining whether to have regard to that response, consider if taking the response into account would delay a key aspect of the case.
b) If taking the response into account would delay a key aspect of the case, the Commissioner must consider:
8. Relevant information – section 269T
a) When determining if an exporter is an uncooperative exporter, the Commissioner must consider the legislated period for providing a response to be a reasonable period
b) The Commissioner must determine an exporter to be an uncooperative exporter, on the basis that no relevant information was provided in a reasonable period, if that exporter:
9. Relevant information – section 269TAACA
a) When determining if an entity is a non-cooperative entity for the purposes of section 269TAACA, the Commissioner must consider the legislated period for providing a response to be a reasonable period.
b) The Commissioner must determine an entity to be a non‑cooperative entity for the purposes of section 269TAACA, on the basis that no relevant information was provided in a reasonable period, if that entity:
10. Significantly impeded – sections 269T and 269TAACA
In determining whether or not an exporter or entity has significantly impeded a case, the Commissioner must take into account:
a) any response provided by the exporter or entity to the Commissioner, the timing of the response and any information omitted from the response;
b) the actions or omissions of the exporter or entity during the conduct of this case and the reasonable or likely impacts of those actions or omissions, regardless of intention; and
c) any evidence which reasonably demonstrates an intention on the part of the exporter or entity to significantly obstruct or delay the case.
11. General powers – section 269SMG
In undertaking any assessment or consideration of the actions, omissions, or responses of any interested parties in relation to a case, before making any determination, the Commissioner must take into account:
a) ordinary business practices;
b) ordinary commercial principles; and
c) the relevant industry and the way it operates.