Work Health and Safety (Hazardous Manual Tasks) Code of Practice 2015

 

made under the

 

Work Health and Safety Act 2011, section 274 (Approved Codes of Practice)

 

 

 

 

 

1 Name of instrument

 

This instrument is the Work Health and Safety (Hazardous Manual Tasks) Code of Practice 2015.

 

2 Commencement

 

This instrument commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

3 Code of Practice Approval

 

I approve the Hazardous Manual Tasks Code of Practice. I am satisfied that this code of practice was developed by a process described in section 274(2) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michaelia Cash

Minister for Employment

 

 

18 March 2016

                

Date   

HAZARDOUS MANUAL TASKS

Code of Practice


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOREWORD

1.  Introduction

1.1 What is a musculoskeletal disorder (MSD)?

1.2 What is a hazardous manual task?

1.3 Who has health and safety duties in relation to hazardous manual tasks?

1.4 What is required to manage the risk of musculoskeletal disorders?

2.  Identifying hazardous manual tasks

2.1  How to identify hazardous manual tasks

2.2 Characteristics of Hazardous Manual Tasks

3.  Assessing the Risks

3.  Assessing the Risks

3.1 When should a risk assessment be conducted?

3.2 How to do a risk assessment for hazardous manual tasks

3.3 What are the risk factors?

3.4  What are the sources of the risk?

4.  CONTROLLING THE RISKS

4.1 The hierarchy of control

4.2 Purchasing to eliminate or minimise risks

4.3 Changing the design or layout of work areas

4.4 Changing the nature, size, weight or number of items handled

4.5 Using mechanical aids

4.6 Handling people and animals

4.7 Changing the system of work

4.8 Changing the work environment

4.9 Using administrative control measures

4.10 Implementing control measures

5.  Reviewing control measures

6.  Role of designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers

6.1 Designers

6.2 Manufacturers, importers and suppliers

Appendix A – The risk management process for manual tasks

Appendix b – HazaRdous manual task identification worksheeT

Appendix c – discomfort survey

Appendix D – RISK Assessment WoRKSHEET

Appendix e – Controlling MSD risks through design

Appendix F – references for further risk assessment methods


FOREWORD

This Code of Practice on how to identify hazardous manual tasks and control the risks of workers being affected by musculoskeletal disorders is an approved code of practice under section 274 of the Work Health and Safety Act.

An approved code of practice is a practical guide to achieving the standards of health, safety and welfare required under the Work Health and Safety Act (the WHS Act) and the Work Health and Safety Regulations (the Regulations).

A code of practice applies to anyone who has a duty of care in the circumstances described in the code. In most cases, following an approved code of practice would achieve compliance with the health and safety duties in the WHS Act, in relation to the subject matter of the code. Like regulations, codes of practice deal with particular issues and do not cover all hazards or risks that may arise. The health and safety duties require duty holders to consider all risks associated with work, not only those for which regulations and codes of practice exist.

Codes of practice are admissible in court proceedings under the WHS Act and Regulations. Courts may regard a code of practice as evidence of what is known about a hazard, risk or control and may rely on the code in determining what is reasonably practicable in the circumstances to which the code relates.

Compliance with the WHS Act and Regulations may be achieved by following another method, such as a technical or an industry standard, if it provides an equivalent or higher standard of work health and safety than the code.

An inspector may refer to an approved code of practice when issuing an improvement or prohibition notice. 

This Code of Practice has been developed by Safe Work Australia as a model code of practice under the Council of Australian Governments’ Inter-Governmental Agreement for Regulatory and Operational Reform in Occupational Health and Safety for adoption by the Commonwealth, state and territory governments.

A draft of this Code of Practice was released for public consultation on 7 December 2010 and was endorsed by the Workplace Relations Ministers Council on 10 August 2011.

This Code provides practical guidance to persons conducting a business or undertaking on how to manage the risk of musculoskeletal disorders arising from hazardous manual tasks in the workplace. It applies to all types of work and all workplaces where manual tasks are carried out.

This Code explains how to identify hazardous manual tasks, assess the risks of musculoskeletal disorders and eliminate or minimise those risks. This guidance is also relevant for designers, manufacturers, importers or suppliers of equipment, materials and tools used for work, as well as designers of workplaces where manual tasks are carried out.  

In providing guidance, the word ‘should’ is used in this Code to indicate a recommended course of action, while ‘may’ is used to indicate an optional course of action.

This Code also includes various references to provisions of the WHS Act and Regulations which set out the legal requirements. These references are not exhaustive. The words ‘must’, ‘requires’ or ‘mandatory’ indicate that a legal requirement exists and must be complied with.


1. Introduction

Most jobs involve carrying out some type of manual task using the body to move or hold an object, people or animals. Manual tasks cover a wide range of activities including stacking shelves, working on a conveyor line and entering data into a computer.

Some manual tasks are hazardous and may cause musculoskeletal disorders. These are the most common workplace injuries across Australia.

A musculoskeletal disorder, as defined in the WHS Regulations, means an injury to, or a disease of, the musculoskeletal system, whether occurring suddenly or over time. It does not include an injury caused by crushing, entrapment (such as fractures and dislocations) or cutting resulting from the mechanical operation of plant.

MSDs may include conditions such as:

MSDs occur in two ways:

Injuries can also occur due to a combination of these mechanisms, for example, body tissue that has been weakened by cumulative damage may be vulnerable to sudden injury by lower forces.

A hazardous manual task, as defined in the WHS Regulations, means a task that requires a person to lift, lower, push, pull, carry or otherwise move, hold or restrain any person, animal or thing involving one or more of the following:

These factors (known as characteristics of a hazardous manual task) directly stress the body and can lead to injury.

A person conducting a business or undertaking has the primary duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that workers and other persons are not exposed to health and safety risks arising from the business or undertaking.

The WHS Regulations include specific obligations for persons conducting a business or undertaking to manage the risk of a musculoskeletal disorder associated with a hazardous manual task.

Designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers of plant and structures that are likely to be handled or used during or as part of a manual task have an important role in eliminating or minimising the risks of MSDs, which are often associated with the poor design and layout of work areas as well as the design of equipment, tools, packaging and materials. They must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the plant or structure they design, manufacture, import or supply is without risks to health and safety (see Chapter 6 of this Code for further guidance).

Officers, such as company directors, have a duty to exercise due diligence to ensure that the business or undertaking complies with the WHS Act and Regulations. This includes taking reasonable steps to ensure that the business or undertaking has and uses appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise risks that arise from hazardous manual tasks.

Workers have a duty to take reasonable care for their own health and safety and that they do not adversely affect the health and safety of other persons. Workers must comply with any reasonable instruction and cooperate with any reasonable policy or procedure relating to health and safety at the workplace. 

Regulation 60: A person conducting a business or undertaking must manage risks to health and safety relating to a musculoskeletal disorder associated with a hazardous manual task.

Regulation 34-38: In order to manage risk under the WHS Regulations, a duty holder must:

This Code provides guidance on how to manage the risks associated with those manual tasks that have the potential to cause MSDs by following a systematic process that involves:

A summary of this process in relation to manual tasks is at Appendix A. Guidance on the general risk management process is available in the Code of Practice: How to Manage Work Health and Safety Risks.

Section 47: The person conducting the business or undertaking must consult, so far as is reasonably practicable, with workers who carry out work for the business or undertaking who are (or are likely to be) directly affected by a work health and safety matter.

Section 48: If the workers are represented by a health and safety representative, the consultation must involve that representative.

Consultation involves sharing of information, giving workers a reasonable opportunity to express views and taking those views into account before making decisions on health and safety matters.

Consultation with workers and their health and safety representatives is necessary at each step of the risk management process. Your workers know which tools and activities contribute to their discomfort and may have practical suggestions or potential solutions.

It is important to consult your workers as early as possible when planning to:

You should also encourage your workers to report problems with manual tasks and signs of discomfort immediately so that risks can be managed before an injury occurs.

Section 46: If more than one person has a duty in relation to the same matter, each person with the duty must, so far as is reasonably practicable, consult, co-operate and co-ordinate activities with all other persons who have a work health or safety duty in relation to the same matter.

Sometimes you may share responsibility for a health and safety matter with other business operators who are involved in the same activities or who share the same workplace. In these situations, you must exchange information to find out who is doing what and work together in a co-operative and co-ordinated way so that all risks are eliminated or minimised so far as is reasonably practicable.

For example, if a supplier visits your workplace to deliver goods, you should discuss with the supplier how the goods will be handled at your workplace, whether there are any environmental or other factors that may increase the risk (for example, using a flight of stairs while handling large boxes) and what you each will do to control any risk of injury.

Further guidance is available in the Code of Practice: Work Health and Safety Consultation, Co-operation and Co-ordination.


2. Identifying hazardous manual tasks

The first step in managing risks from carrying out manual tasks is to identify those tasks that have the potential to cause MSDs. Hazards that arise from manual tasks generally involve interaction between a worker and:

Workers who perform manual tasks can provide valuable information about discomfort, muscular aches and pains that can signal potential hazards. For example, you could ask workers to identify tasks that:

A discomfort survey that may be used is at Appendix B.

Records of workplace injuries and incidents, inspection reports and any workers compensation claims made for MSDs should be reviewed to help identify which manual tasks may cause harm. However, not all hazardous manual tasks will be associated with reported incidents, therefore it is important to gather additional information.

Information and advice about hazardous manual tasks and risks relevant to particular industries and work activities is available from regulators, industry associations, unions, technical specialists and safety consultants.

You may be able to identify trends or common problems from the information you collect. Trends may show that certain tasks have more characteristics that make them hazardous or that some characteristics are more common in certain jobs. Trends may also show that workers in a particular location are exposed to more hazardous manual tasks than in other areas and this could indicate a problem with the design and layout of that work area or the way work is carried out there.

These trends may help in deciding which manual tasks should be addressed as a priority.

Hazardous manual tasks can also be identified by looking at how people actually work and focussing on their postures and movements. A manual task is hazardous if it involves any of the following characteristics (described in Section 2.2):

Things to look out for include:

The hazard identification worksheet in Appendix C may be used to record your findings.

Force is the amount of muscular effort required to perform a movement or task. Forceful muscular exertions overload muscles, tendons, joints and discs and are associated with most MSDs.

Repetitive force - using force repeatedly over a period of time to move or support an object

 

Examples of repetitive force include:

  • lifting and stacking goods onto a pallet
  • gripping and handling bricks when bricklaying (Figure 1)
  • repetitively pressing components with the thumbs or other part of the hand to assemble an item
  • prolonged application of therapeutic massage treatments
  • removing splinting material from patients using shears.

Figure 1

Gripping and handling bricks when bricklaying.

Sustained force - occurs when force is applied continually over a period of time.

Examples of sustained force include:

  • pushing or pulling a trolley around hospital wards (Figure 2)
  • holding down a trigger to operate a power tool
  • supporting a plaster sheet while fixing it to a ceiling
  • carrying objects over long distances
  • supporting, positioning or stabilising a patient’s limb during surgery or when applying splinting or casting material

Figure 2

Pushing or pulling a trolley around hospital wards.

High force – may be exerted by the back, arm or leg muscles or by the hands and fingers.

High force occurs in any tasks that:

  • a worker describes as very demanding physically
  • a worker needs help to do because of the effort it requires
  • require a stronger person or two persons to do the task.

Examples of high force include:

  • Lifting, lowering or carrying a heavy object
  • Lifting, lowering or carrying an object that cannot be positioned close to the body
  • pushing or pulling an object that is hard to move or stop
  • restraining a person or animal.(Figure 3)

Figure 3

Lifting, lowering or carrying an object that cannot be positioned close to the body).

Examples of high force using the hands and fingers include:

  • using a finger-grip, a pinch-grip or an open-handed grip to handle a heavy or large load
  • operating hand tools with tight squeeze grips(Figure 4)

gripping small instruments with high force, for example, a dental hygienist cleaning teeth.

Figure 4

Operating hand tools with tight squeeze grips.

Sudden force jerky or unexpected movements while handling an item or load are particularly hazardous because the body must suddenly adapt to the changing force.  

Tasks where force is applied suddenly and with speed also generates high force.

Examples of sudden force include:
 

  • impact recoil of a large nail gun
  • throwing or catching objects
  • cutting reinforcement steel with large bolt cutters
  • carrying an unbalanced or unstable load such as bagged stock feed pellets that suddenly moves (Figure 5)
  • handling frightened or resistant animals 
  • handling patients who suddenly resist or no longer assist during the handling procedure.

Figure 5

Carrying an unbalanced or unstable load such as bagged stock feed pellets that suddenly moves.


Movement

Repetitive movement – using the same parts of the body to repeat similar movements over a period of time.

Examples of repetitive movement include:

  • painting
  • lifting goods from a conveyor belt and packing them in a carton
  • typing and other keyboard tasks(Figure 6)
  • repeatedly reaching for and assembling components in electronics manufacturing
  • using a socket and ratchet or spanner to unscrew long bolts.

Figure 6

Typing and other keyboard tasks.

 

 

Posture

An ideal posture is one where the trunk and head are upright and forward facing, the arms are by the side of the body, the forearms are either hanging straight or at right angles to the upper arm, and the hand is in the handshake position.

Postures that are both awkward and sustained are particularly hazardous.

Sustained posture – where part of or the whole body is kept in the same position for a prolonged period.

Examples of sustained posture include:

  • supporting plasterboard sheeting while it is nailed into place (Figure 7)
  • continually standing with weight mainly on one leg while operating a power press with foot pedal controls.

Figure 7

Supporting plasterboard sheeting while it is nailed into place.

Awkward posture –
where any part of the body
is in an uncomfortable or unnatural position, such as:

  • postures that are unbalanced or asymmetrical
  • postures that require extreme joint angles or bending and twisting.

Examples of awkward posture include:

  • squatting while servicing plant or a vehicle
  • working with arms overhead
  • bending over a desk or table
  • using a hand tool that causes the wrist to be bent to the side
  • kneeling while trowelling concrete or laying carpet
  • bending the neck or back to the side to see around bulky items pushed on a trolley. (Figure 8)

Figure 8

Bending the neck or back to the side to see around bulky items pushed on a trolley.

Vibration There are two common forms of vibration according to contact points between the body and the source:

Whole body vibration occurs when vibration is transmitted through the whole body, usually via a supporting surface, such as a seat or the floor in heavy vehicles or machinery. This may result in lower back pain, degeneration of the lumbar vertebrae and disc herniation.

Examples of whole body vibration include:

  • operating mobile plant such as heavy earth moving machinery
  • driving a vehicle over rough terrain.(Figure 9)

Figure 9

Driving a vehicle over rough terrain.

Hand-arm vibration occurs when vibration is transferred through a vibrating tool, steering wheel or controls in heavy machinery to the hand and arm. This can disrupt blood circulation in the hand and forearm and damage nerves and tendons. Localised vibration contributes to ‘vibration-induced white finger’ and ‘carpal tunnel syndrome’ through the gripping force needed to hold the vibrating tools (the tighter the grip, the more vibration is absorbed) and the repetitive shock loads of some tools.

Examples of hand-arm vibration include:

  • using impact wrenches, chainsaws, jackhammers, grinders, drills or vibrating compacting plates (Figure10-11)
  • using needle guns in de-rusting metal.

Figure 10-11

Using impact wrenches, chainsaws, jackhammers, grinders, drills or vibrating compacting plates.

Using impact wrenches, chainsaws, jackhammers, grinders, drills or vibrating compacting plates.


3. Assessing the Risks

A risk assessment involves examining the characteristics of the hazardous manual task in more detail to assess whether the forces, movements and postures are undertaken in such a way that they give rise to the risk of MSDs. 

You should carry out a risk assessment for any manual tasks that you have identified as being hazardous, unless the risk is well-known and you know how to control it. A risk assessment can help you determine:

Identify who should participate in the risk assessment, for example those workers who do the task or their health and safety representative, and management who have control over how the task is done. Describe the task and area where the manual task is performed. Note which body parts are likely to be at risk of injury, then work through the assessment together to determine which risk factors pose a risk and why the risk exists.

The whole task should be examined, although it may help to look at the task in stages to identify all of the risk factors. For example, the task of putting stationery items away in a storage cabinet may involve the following steps:

Looking at each of the steps identifies the different sources of risk, which are the things that should be changed to control the risks.

For some complex situations, expert or specialist advice may be useful when conducting a risk assessment. There are a range of risk assessment tools that may be used. Further information is in Appendix F.

If a number of your workers carry out very similar hazardous manual tasks, you may assess these tasks together as a group instead of assessing each task individually. However, you should only do a group risk assessment if all the tasks are sufficiently similar and do not expose a worker to a different risk than if individual assessments were carried out.


Working through the following questions will assist in determining which postures, movements and forces of the task pose a risk. The Risk Assessment Worksheet at Appendix D may be used to record the findings.

As a general guideline, ‘repetitive’ means that a movement or force is performed more than twice a minute and ‘sustained’ means a posture or force is held for more than 30 seconds at a time.

Examples of postures and movements that pose a risk if they are repetitive or sustained are:

Bending the back or head forwards or sideways more than 20 degrees

 

Figure 12

Bending the head forwards or sideways more than 20 degrees.

Figure 13

Bending the back forwards or sideways more than 20 degrees.

Bending the back or head backwards more than 5 degrees or looking up

Figure 14

Bending the back or head backwards more than 5 degrees or looking up.

Twisting the back or neck more than 20 degrees

Figure 15

Twisting the neck more than 20 degrees.

Figure 16

Twisting the back more than 20 degrees.

Working with one or both hands above shoulder height

Figure 17

Working with one or both hands above shoulder height.

Reaching forward or sideways more than 30cm from the body

Figure 18

Reaching forward or sideways more than 30cm from the body.

Figure 19

Reaching forward or sideways more than 30cm from the body.

Reaching behind the body

Figure 20

Reaching behind the body.

Standing with most of the body’s weight on one leg

Figure 21

Standing with most of the body’s weight on one leg.

Twisting, turning, grabbing, picking or wringing actions with the fingers, hands or arms that includes excessive bending of the wrist

Figure 22

Twisting, turning, grabbing, picking or wringing actions with the fingers, hands or arms that includes excessive bending of the wrist.

Working with the fingers close together or wide apart

Figure 23

Working with the fingers close together or wide apart.

Squatting, kneeling, crawling, lying, semi-lying or jumping.

Figure 24

Squatting, kneeling, crawling, lying, semi-lying or jumping.

Very fast movements, for example packing bottles from a fast moving process line.

Figure 25

Packing bottles from a fast moving process line.

The risk increases as the degree of bending and twisting increases. The risk is greatest when the postures and movements are extreme, that is, toward the end of the movement range, and when they feel uncomfortable for the worker.

If you have assessed a task as involving postures, movements or forces that are also repetitive (more than two per minute) and/or sustained (held for more than 30 seconds), you should determine the duration of the task.

The duration of the task is how long the task is carried out over a whole shift or continually at any time during a shift. Tasks that continue over a long period or are repeated over the work day increase the risk of injury.

As a general guideline, long duration means the task is done for more than a total of 2 hours over a whole shift or continuously for more than 30 minutes at a time.

Keep in mind that workers may use the same parts of the body to repeat similar movements when carrying out various tasks that are similar in nature over time.

High forces can cause MSDs even if they are not repetitive or sustained. This means that any task involving high force may be a risk, even if it is only done occasionally or for short periods. The longer and more often force is applied and the higher the force, the greater the risk.

The risk in tasks involving high force is related to:

High and sudden forces are commonly associated with the handling of live persons or animals and loads that are unstable, unbalanced or difficult to hold.

 

 

 

 

  •  

Prolonged exposure to whole-body or hand-arm vibration increases the risk of MSDs and other health problems. The degree of risk increases as the duration of exposure increases and when the amplitude of vibration is high.

Some examples of sources of vibration are: 

The task involves a risk of MSD if you have answered ‘yes’ to either:

  • Question 1 and Question 2

The task involves repetitive or sustained postures, movements or forces, and it involves long duration.

  • Question 3

The task involves high force or sudden force.

  • Question 4

The task involves vibration

A task may involve more than one risk factor. Where a number of risk factors are present and interact within a task, the risk of MSD increases significantly.

When conducting the assessment, think about the sources of any risks that are present in the task. These will be the things that you may be able to change to eliminate or reduce the risk of MSD.   For example, poor postures and movements may be due to the layout of the workplace, high forces may be due to the loads being handled, and the frequency and duration of the task may be due to the work organisation, limited staff numbers or increased work pace to meet tight deadlines.

The main sources of risk are:

These sources of risk can also make the task more difficult to perform and therefore increase the risk of MSD.

For each risk factor, you should ask:

The answers to these questions will provide the information on how to fix the source of the risk and hence control the risk of MSD.

A work area includes work benches, conveyors, furniture and fittings and the equipment used by workers doing that job. The positioning and relationship of the different elements in a work area to each other and to the worker are important because of the effect on working postures.

A work area that is designed without consideration of the risks that arise from hazardous manual tasks may impose awkward postures on workers undertaking manual tasks, for example, bent and twisted positions with shoulders raised and the need to reach for items or carry loads over long distances.

Loads can be a source of risk due to the amount of muscular effort needed to handle them. The harder to grip and control a person, animal or thing, the greater the force required to handle them.

The risk can arise from:

Tools that are unsuitable for the task can be a source of risk by increasing the force required, or by promoting sustained or awkward postures. Risks can arise from:

Weight – heavy hand tools, particularly if held for long periods of time, increase the force and effort required to perform a task, for example, a 3kg power drill used on an assembly line.

Balance – if the heaviest part of the tool is in front of the wrist, the force required to grip the tool and stop it tilting forward is increased.

Handle design – if the handle diameter is too large or too small, the grip span of the hand will create awkward postures and greater force will be required to control the tool. A handle that is too short or has prominent edges, can result in damaging compression of the palm.

Handle orientation – if the handle design does not place the wrist in a handshake position, the worker will need to use an awkward posture to operate the tool. Tools that cannot be adapted for use by both hands or are designed for right-handed use only can result in awkward postures and increased force.

Shock loading and impact – tools that deliver impacts such as hammers, hammer drills, and nail guns transmit impact forces to various ligaments and can require the use of a firmer grip to maintain control. They are a particular source of risk if used repetitively and for long periods.

Prolonged use – continued use of any hand tool (even tools that are well suited to the user and designed for the task) without adequate time to recover will increase risk of injury due to the sustained force to support it.  In particular, vibrating tools increase risk.

Maintenance – poorly maintained or irregular service of tools and equipment may increase the effort needed to use them. For example, an unsharpened knife will increase the force required to bone and slice meat.

Systems of work, or the way work is organised, can influence the physical and mental demands that a manual task places on a worker. The fatigue and strain (physical and mental) that may arise from the aspects of work (task demands, task control and resources and support provided) bring on physiological responses such as increased muscular tension and affect the function of muscles, nerves and blood vessels, increasing the risk of the worker developing an MSD. 

The sources of risk include:

Remember that workers will also have different physical and psychological characteristics and these individual factors may increase the risk, for example:

The sources of risk in the work environment include:


4. CONTROLLING THE RISKS

Now you know which risk factors are present, where they are present and why they are present (sources of the risk), you are in a position to know what must be controlled and work out how to
do it.

The ways of controlling the risk of MSDs are ranked from the highest level of protection and reliability to the lowest. This ranking is known as the hierarchy of risk control. The WHS Regulations require duty holders to work through this hierarchy to choose the control that most effectively eliminates or minimises the risk in the circumstances. This may involve a single control measure or a combination of two or more different controls.

The most effective control measure involves eliminating the hazardous manual task and its associated risk. Eliminating hazards and risks is usually easier and cheaper to achieve in the planning or design stage of an item, process or place used for work. 

If it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate the risk, then you must minimise the risks so far as
is reasonably practicable by:

If there is a remaining risk, it must be minimised so far as is reasonably practicable by implementing administrative controls, and if a risk still remains, then suitable personal protective equipment must be provided and used. These two types of control measures, when used on their own, tend to be least effective in minimising risks because they rely on human behaviour and supervision.

Control measures should be aimed at eliminating or minimising the frequency, magnitude and duration of movements, forces and postures by changing the source of risk: the work area, tool, load, environment, method of handling and/or the way work is organised.

Hierarchy of control

Examples of control measures

Level 1

Elimination

  • Automate the manual task (such as using remote controls)
  • Deliver goods directly to the point of use to eliminate multiple handling

Level 2

Substitution

  • Replace heavy items with those that are lighter, smaller and/or easier to handle
  • Replace hand tools with power tools to reduce the level of force required to do the task

Isolation

  • Isolate vibrating machinery from the user, for example by providing fully independent seating on mobile plant

Engineering

  • Use mechanical lifting aids
  • Provide workstations that are height adjustable

Level 3

 

Administrative

  • Rotate workers between different tasks
  • Train workers to use control measures implemented when carrying out manual tasks

Personal protective equipment

  • Heat resistant gloves for handling hot items
  • Shock absorbent shoes for work on hard concrete floors

Before purchasing equipment, such as tools, containers, workstations, machinery and vehicles, you should always check whether the item has been designed so that it can be used safely and best matches the needs of your workers. Where possible, you should:

A well-designed work area will assist in eliminating or reducing the risk factors associated with
a hazardous manual task, such as the degree of reaching, twisting or bending.

Workstations should be designed to allow workers to work in an upright position, shoulders in a natural position (not elevated) and upper arms close to the trunk most of the time without large reaches to perform the task. Work surfaces should be easily adjustable to suit a range of workers and the tasks they perform.

Where it is not possible to provide adjustable workstations consider altering the design so that:

Tasks with high visual demands should be performed above elbow height and work surfaces may need to be tilted, for example, for tasks involving delicate or precise manipulation.

Tasks where the hands make a narrow range of movements and can rest on the work surface should be performed at, or just above, elbow height. A sloping surface may reduce the amount of neck flexion required to perform desk-based tasks, such as drafting.

Light manipulative tasks or tasks involving the use of a keyboard should be performed at just below elbow height.

Tasks incorporating a range of arm movements using the shoulder should be performed at between hip and shoulder height, for example taking items from a stack and placing them on
a conveyor.

Tasks requiring considerable muscular effort or use of the body for leverage, for example, drilling at a workbench, should be performed at hip height and no higher.

Where possible, place items used in manual tasks so they are:

Displays and controls should be positioned to encourage comfortable head and neck postures, comfortable hand and arm reach and efficient use. You should:

Workers should not remain in a seated, standing or otherwise static posture for prolonged periods. Design the workstation to provide opportunities for workers performing seated or standing tasks to vary their postures and movements

For seated tasks, seating should have the following features:

A seated work position is best for:

Workers carrying out standing tasks should be provided with:

A standing work position is best when:

Work areas should have enough space to accommodate the number of workers and other people involved in the task, any equipment that might be required and space to operate the equipment safely.  For example, when observing workers of an aged care facility assisting an infirm person to bathe, the bathroom may need to accommodate two workers, the client and a mobile hoist with space to manoeuvre a person in the hoist over the toilet and bath or into a shower area.

Examples of control measures that should be considered when handling loads include:

Figure 26 Use handling grip devices adapted to the particular object to be carried

Example of using handling grip devices adapted to the particular object to be carried.

Hand tools should be designed to:

Minimise the level of muscular effort, particularly of the shoulder and wrist, needed to use hand tools by:

Tools and equipment should be well maintained by carrying out regular inspections and servicing in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.

Figure 27 Select tools that can be held with a neutral wrist or in a handshake position with the hand adopting a comfortable (not too open or too closed) grip. Orient jigs and fixtures holding the workpiece so that the wrist does not have to bend.

Example of tools that can be held with a neutral wrist or in a handshake position with the hand adopting a comfortable (not too open or too closed) grip.

Excessive bending of the wrist is required to use this tool.

Example showing excessive bending of the wrist while using a tool.


Modifying the tool eliminates the awkward wrist posture

Example where modifying the tool eliminates awkward wrist posture.

Figure 28 Select tools that are suited to the task, such as long handled saws when pruning trees.

Example of tools suited to the task, such as long handled saws when pruning trees.

The heaviest part of this brush cutter is located behind the wrists and the weight is supported by a harness.

Example showing the heaviest part of the brush cutter behind the wrists and the weight is supported by a harness.

An overhead suspension system reduces the forces required to use the iron.

Example of an overhead suspension system that reduces the forces required to use the iron.

Mechanical equipment may eliminate or reduce the need for workers to lift, carry or support items, animals or people. A wide range of mechanical aids is available for various industries, for example: (Figure 29-31)

Figure 29 Example of lift table

Picture of a lift table.

Figure 30 Mechanical lifter hand to lift people

Picture of a mechanical lifter hand to lift people.


Figure 31 Using mechanical equipment, such as overhead cranes to lift
and move very heavy objects eliminates the need to apply high force.

Example showing mechanical equipment, such as overhead cranes to lift and move very heavy objects.

A vacuum operated lifting device can reduce the forces, awkward postures,
and movements required to manually load products onto pallets.

Picture of a vacuum operated lifting device.

A self-adjusting base in the laundry tubs reduces the need for bending,
twisting and reaching during unloading

Picture of a self-adjusting base in laundry tubs to reduce the need for bending, twisting and reaching during unloading.

Mechanical aids should be:

When you introduce a mechanical aid into the workplace, you must provide adequate information, instruction, training and supervision to ensure that new arrangements do not introduce any additional risks to workers, for example, a forklift operated in the same workspace used by other workers.

Pushing loads is preferable to pulling because it involves less work by the muscles of the lower back, allows maximum use of body weight, less awkward postures and generally allows workers to adopt a forward facing posture, providing better vision in the direction of travel.

Reduce the effort required to start the load in motion by:

Reduce the effort to keep the load moving by:

Reduce the effort needed to stop the load by:


Figure 32 A trolley can eliminate many of the risks involved in manual handling, however,
the load will still need to be manoeuvered onto the trolley and through the workplace.

Picture of a trolley.

No worker should fully lift a person (other than a small infant) unaided, that is without assistance from, for example, mechanical aids, assistive devices or another worker. All people handling activities are a potential source of injury and the risks associated with this hazardous manual task must be eliminated or minimised so far as is reasonably practicable.

With people handling, the health and safety of the person being handled needs to be considered as well as the health and safety of the worker/s and others involved in the task. The physical condition of the person being handled as well as their non-physical characteristics, for example their ability to understand and communicate and their behaviour, will affect how the people handling activity is undertaken and the risks involved.

When people are being handled, the controls selected should take into account all of the sources of risks. Controls may include the following:

Supporting or restraining animals should only be carried out by people with the necessary skills and experience. When animals are being handled consider the following:

The workload and pace should accommodate the physical demands of the manual task. Where possible, work should be organised to minimise multiple handling and improve the flow of work by:

Workers should not have to work at a rate that is at the limit of their ability. When you establish a work rate, you should consult with the workers affected and their health and safety representatives. Set realistic work rates by:


Figure 33 The work rate for high volume production and processing
should not extend workers to their physical limits.

The work rate for high volume production and processing should not extend workers to their physical limits.

Task design should take account of the range of human dimensions and capabilities such as height, reach and weight. Adapt work systems to accommodate the health/fitness status of a worker. If this is not reasonably practicable, allocate the worker to other tasks. In designing work systems, considerations also include:

Provide transition arrangements for workers undertaking unaccustomed work by:

When introducing risk control measures that involve plant, tools or equipment, ensure that:

To allow for adequate recovery time and to reduce exposure to risks of MSD, arrange to have the right staffing levels, skill mix and shift arrangements considering:

Communicate and consult with workers about the way work is organised and allow workers to seek assistance from another person when necessary.

Whole-body vibration – the design of vibration damped equipment and engine mountings are the most effective methods of controlling vibration exposure. Other strategies to reduce exposure include:

Hand-arm vibration – substitute alternative manufacturing methods or processes to eliminate the need for vibrating equipment. Where this is not possible, the best strategy is to purchase tools and equipment that produce less vibration. 

To control exposure to cold conditions you should:

For workers in hot and humid conditions, reduce temperature and humidity during manual tasks where possible by:

Consider minimising the risk of exposure to windy conditions by:

Keeping work areas clean, tidy and free of clutter or obstacles prevents workers from adopting awkward postures and reduces the level of exertion that may be required to reach over or around obstacles. Clean, smooth and flat surfaces can also reduce forces required to push and pull objects and prevent slips, trips and falls.

Select lighting to suit the task performed. To prevent awkward or sustained postures that may arise from low or excessive levels of lighting, glare or reflection:

Administrative control measures do not address the risk factors or source of the risk – they only attempt to reduce risk by reducing exposure to those risk factors.

The risk of MSDs may be minimised by rotating staff between different tasks to increase task variety. Job rotation requires the tasks to be sufficiently different to ensure that different muscle groups are used in different ways so they have a chance to recover. To increase task variety, you should consider:

Regular rest breaks provide opportunities for workers to prevent the build-up of, or recover from the effects of, fatigue in muscle groups used during hazardous manual tasks that involve:

The frequency and duration of rest breaks will be dependent on the nature of the task.  Generally, the greater the force required, or the longer a posture is sustained, the greater the recovery time.

More frequent and shorter rest breaks are better for rest and recovery than fewer, longer breaks.  Build short breaks into task rotation arrangements where work is of a similar nature, for example process production or hand tool use. Micro-pauses (very short intermittent breaks) in physical activity are also beneficial. Build these into the design of tasks and methods of work, for example:

Team handling is manual handling of a load by two or more workers.  Team handling brings its own risks and requires coordination. It should only be used as an interim control measure. You should redesign manual tasks to allow the use of mechanical equipment, or eliminate the need to lift, if there is a regular need for team handling. Team lifting can increase the risk of MSD if:

Whenever team handling is used it is essential to match workers, co-ordinate and carefully plan the lift. You should ensure that:

If a risk of MSDs remains after implementing higher level control measures, then the risk must be minimised by providing information, training and instruction. Training in lifting techniques must not be used as the sole or primary means to control the risk of MSDs.

Risk control may initially involve using short term, interim measures while a long term solution is developed. For example, temporarily raise the bench until it can be replaced or altered permanently, or rotate employees through a production line to reduce the time spent working at a low bench until it can be changed.

To implement the most effective risk controls, you should:

You should not make final decisions on the effectiveness of the control measures that you have implemented until enough time has passed for your workers to adjust to the changes. Workers should be given a chance to practice using the new workstation, tool, mechanical device or new work method. Some modifications may require workers to use new muscle groups or different parts of the body and they may initially feel some discomfort. At this stage, you should frequently check with your workers how they feel the improvements are working.

Training in the type of control measures implemented should be provided during induction into a new job and as part of an on-going manual task risk control program. Training should be provided to:

The training should include information on:

You should review your training program regularly and also when there is change to work processes, plant or equipment, implementation of new control measures, relevant legislation or other issues that may impact on the way the task is performed.

You should keep records of induction and training given to your workers. The records can include information such as the date of the session, the topics dealt with, and the name and signature of the trainer and each of the workers who attended the session.

 


5. Reviewing control measures

Control measures that have been implemented must be reviewed and, if necessary, revised to make sure they work as planned and to maintain a work environment that is without risks to health and safety.

Regulation 38: A person conducting a business or undertaking must review and as necessary revise risk control measures:

Control measures may be reviewed using the same methods as the initial hazard identification step. Consult your workers involved in the manual task and their health and safety representatives and consider the following:

If problems are found, go back through the risk management steps, review your information and make further decisions about risk control.


6. Role of designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers

The best time to eliminate or minimise the risk of MSDs is in the design and planning stage – when hazards and risks can be ‘designed out’ before they are introduced into a workplace.

Designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers of plant and structures have duties under the WHS Act to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that these products are without risks to health and safety when used for a purpose for which they were designed or manufactured.

Regulation 61: Designers of plant or structures used for work must:  

Ergonomic principles should be applied in the design stage. This means that a manual task should be designed to fit the people doing the task, not the reverse. Ergonomics involves consideration of the variability in human capability and an understanding of how people interact with the work environment, tools and equipment.

If you provide your design to another person (for example, a manufacturer) then you must provide certain information, including:

Quality assurance processes can be used to check that the product effectively minimises the risk of MSDs. When modifying a design, take into account feedback from purchasers and users of your product.

Designers of buildings used as workplaces should consider the manual tasks that may be performed throughout the lifecycle of the building, from construction through to use, maintenance, refurbishment and potential demolition. For example, design:

Some types of workplaces, such as hospitals, nursing homes, warehouses and distribution centres that carry out a high level of manual tasks will have particular design requirements to eliminate or minimise the risk of MSDs.

The safe design of plant can play a critical role in reducing the risk of MSD for workers. When designing plant, consider all phases of its life, including manufacture, cleaning and servicing.

If practicable, trial a prototype in a range of operating conditions and think about how the plant will be used. Change any aspects of the design that increase the risk of injury, for example:

Appendix E lists some examples of design-related MSD risks for plant, and shows how to control the risks through safe design.

Regulation 61: Manufacturers of plant or structures must:

Importers and suppliers must take all reasonable steps to obtain that information the designer or manufacture is required to give and provide it to any person to whom the plant or structure is supplied.

Manufacturers, importers and suppliers should consider the way their products are packaged and delivered to workplaces to eliminate or minimise the risk of MSDs, for example:

Packaged items should be arranged so the package is well balanced and the contents will not shift unexpectedly while being handled, for example:

Manufacturers, importers and suppliers must also give purchasers and users the information they need to use the product safely, including during its transportation, operation and maintenance.
This information may be provided in user manuals, brochures or on the product itself (for example, labelling cartons). The information should be accurate, clear and easy to understand.

Loads should be labelled to indicate any MSD risks, and where appropriate, any necessary precautions when handling the load. This information should indicate:

Information provided by the designer to the manufacturer should be passed on to the supplier and then to the purchaser. Importers should obtain the information from their suppliers.

If you are an importer or a supplier and you cannot get this information from the designer or manufacturer, you should obtain information from other sources or develop it yourself.


Appendix A The risk management process for manual tasks

The risk management process for manual tasks.

Appendix b – HazaRdous manual task identification worksheeT

Hazardous manual task identification worksheet.

Appendix c – discomfort survey

Discomfort survey.

 

Appendix DRISK Assessment WoRKSHEET

Risk assessment worksheet.


Risk assessment worksheet.


Risk assessment worksheet.


Risk assessment worksheet.


Risk assessment worksheet.

Risk assessment worksheet.


 

Appendix e Controlling MSD risks through design

Type of plant

MSD risk

Possible design solution

Road-making machinery

Repetitive or sustained twisting of the neck and body while reversing. This is caused by the seat being fixed in a forward-facing position.

Design a swivel seat-mount together with two sets of controls, or controls that move with seat rotation.

Forklifts

Sustained exposure to whole-body vibration transferred through the seat.

Repetitive or sustained bending of the neck and back to see the work properly (for example, continually looking up to place loads on high shelves).

Install damping mechanisms in the seat, cabin and vehicle suspension.

Install visual aids such as mirrors or a video camera and screen.

Wrapping machines on process lines

Strain on the lower back when handling heavy rolls of plastic wrapping in awkward and twisted postures, often above shoulder height. This is caused by inappropriate design and positioning of the roll spindle and by restricted access.

Design the spindle to be adjustable. This allows the rolls to be loaded at a suitable height and orientation, and eliminates the need to lift them.

Design equipment to help worker load rolls.

Locate the spindle in an accessible place on the plant.

Provide information about how to install the plant in a way that allows adequate access.

Power drills

Prolonged use of the forearm muscles and wrist caused by a heavy or poorly balanced drill.

Exposure to vibration or impact shock recoil from hammer drills.

Excessive force needed to grip and control the tool to counter the effect of vibration and impact shocks.

Design drills to be as light as possible.

Design drills with the handle under the drill’s centre of gravity.

Design plant to reduce shock and vibration.

Provide a suitable way of holding the tool with both hands.

Pliers

Pressure to the palm of the hand caused by handles that are too short.

Prolonged use of the forearm muscles and compression of the wrist caused by using pliers with straight handles.

Design pliers with handles that extend beyond the palm.

Design pliers with bent handles so that the user can maintain a straight wrist.

Crimping, clamping and cutting tools

Excessive force with outstretched fingers required to grip handles that are too wide apart.

Design handles with a grip span of 10 cm or less.

Chainsaws

Excessive vibration.

High force required to handle the chainsaw.

Design to reduce vibration.

Design the chainsaw to be as light as possible, and provide well-placed handles.

Chairs

Poorly designed chairs that cannot be adjusted provide little back support and cause workers to adopt poor postures and movements.

Follow existing design guidelines for chairs, and consider how the chair will be used in the workplace.

Work-benches, workstations and other work surfaces

Workstations that cannot be adjusted result in unnecessary reaching, bending and exertion of force.

Design workstations to be adjustable.

Alternatively, dimensions should suit as many workers as possible.

 

Appendix Freferences for further risk assessment methods

Method

More information

University of Michigan 3 Dimensional Static Strength Prediction Program Computer Software OR University of Michigan 2 Dimensional Static Strength Prediction Computer Software

www.umich.edu

 

1991 NIOSH Lifting Equation (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health – USA)

USA National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/94-110/pdfs/94-110.pdf

Snook and Ciriello’s Tables of Maximum Acceptable Weights and Forces

Snook and Ciriello, “The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces”, in Ergonomics, 1991, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1197-1213.

Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)

Hignett, S and McAtamney, L., Applied Ergonomics, 2000, vol. 31, pp. 201-205

Posture, Activity, Tools, Handling (PATH)

PATH : A work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. Applied Ergonomics 1996, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 177-187

Manual Tasks Risk Assessment Tool (ManTRA) V2.0

 

Burgess-Limerick, L., Straker, L., Pollock, C., Egeskov, R. 2004. Manual Risk Assessment Tool (ManTRA) V2.0. School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Australia.

http://ergonomics.uq.edu.au/download/mantra2.pdf

PErforM

Burgess-Limerick, R. (2004): PErforM and ManTRA. Ergonomics Australia, 18(4), 10-13.

OCRA Index and Checklist

Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E., & Grieco, A. (2002). Risk assessment and management of repetitive movements and exertions of upper limbs : job analysis, OCRA risk indices, prevention strategies and design principles. Oxford: Elsevier.

The Work Organisation Assessment Questionnaire (WOAQ)

EEF (2004). Work Organisation Assessment Questionnaire: A tool for the risk management of stress. London: EEF.

MSD risk assessment questionnaire

Wendy Macdonald, Owen Evans and Ross Armstrong, 2007, Centre for Ergonomics & Human Factors, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University.  Research on the Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders – Stage 2

A study of a small sample of workplaces in high risk industries. Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. OHS EXPERT RESEARCH PANEL. Project No. CIR 1001439-07