PB 24 of 2023
National Health (Highly Specialised Drugs Program) Special Arrangement Amendment (April Update) Instrument 2023
National Health Act 1953
I, NIKOLAI TSYGANOV, Assistant Secretary, Pricing and PBS Policy Branch, Technology Assessment and Access Division, Department of Health and Aged Care, delegate of the Minister for Health and Aged Care, make this Instrument under subsection 100(2) of the National Health Act 1953.
Date 30 March 2023
NIKOLAI TSYGANOV
Assistant Secretary
Pricing and PBS Policy Branch
Technology Assessment and Access Division
1 Name
(1) This instrument is the National Health (Highly Specialised Drugs Program) Special Arrangement Amendment (April Update) Instrument 2023.
(2) This instrument may also be cited as PB 24 of 2023.
2 Commencement
(1) Each provision of this instrument specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms.
Commencement information |
Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
Provisions | Commencement | Date/Details |
1. The whole of this instrument | 1 April 2023 | 1 April 2023 |
Note: This table relates only to the provisions of this instrument as originally made. It will not be amended to deal with any later amendments of this instrument.
(2) Any information in column 3 of the table is not part of this instrument. Information may be inserted in this column, or information in it may be edited, in any published version of this instrument.
3 Authority
This instrument is made under subsection 100(2) of the National Health Act 1953.
4 Schedules
Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.
Schedule 1—Amendments
National Health (Highly Specialised Drugs Program) Special Arrangement 2021 (PB 27 of 2021)
[1] Schedule 1, entry for Abacavir in the form Oral solution 20 mg (as sulfate) per mL, 240 mL
omit from the column headed “Circumstances”: C4454 C4512 substitute: C13920
[2] Schedule 1, entry for Epoprostenol in the form Powder for I.V. infusion 500 micrograms (as sodium)
omit:
| | | EPOPROSTENOL SUN | C13491 C13492 C13505 C13506 C13510 C13512 C13577 C13634 | | See Schedule 2 | See Schedule 2 |
[3] Schedule 1, entry for Epoprostenol in the form Powder for I.V. infusion 1.5 mg (as sodium)
omit:
| | | EPOPROSTENOL SUN | C13491 C13492 C13505 C13506 C13510 C13512 C13577 C13634 | | See Schedule 2 | See Schedule 2 |
[4] Schedule 1, entry for Etanercept
omit:
| Injection 50 mg in 1 mL single use dose‑dispenser cartridges, 4 | Injection | Enbrel | C9384 C9417 C10548 C10578 C10579 C10599 C12357 C12407 | | 1 | 0 |
[5] Schedule 1, entry for Mepolizumab in the form Injection 100 mg in 1 mL single dose pre-filled pen
insert in numerical order in the column headed “Circumstances”: C13864 C13865 C13890
[6] Schedule 1, after entry for Romiplostim in the form Powder for injection 625 micrograms
insert:
Ruxolitinib | Tablet 5 mg | Oral | Jakavi | C13876 C13877 C13891 C13892 C13907 C13911 | P13907 P13911 | 56 | 0 |
| | | | C13876 C13877 C13891 C13892 C13907 C13911 | P13876 P13877 P13891 P13892 | 56 | 5 |
| Tablet 10 mg | Oral | Jakavi | C13876 C13877 C13891 C13892 C13907 C13911 | P13907 P13911 | 56 | 0 |
| | | | C13876 C13877 C13891 C13892 C13907 C13911 | P13876 P13877 P13891 P13892 | 56 | 5 |
[7] Schedule 1, entry for Tocilizumab
(a) omit:
| Concentrate for injection 80 mg in 4 mL s19A | Injection | RoActemra | C10532 C10535 C10536 C10567 C10570 C10571 | | See Schedule 2 | See Schedule 2 |
(b) omit:
| Concentrate for injection 200 mg in 10 mL s19A | Injection | RoActemra | C10532 C10535 C10536 C10567 C10570 C10571 | | See Schedule 2 | See Schedule 2 |
(c) omit:
| Concentrate for injection 400 mg in 20 mL s19A | Injection | RoActemra | C10532 C10535 C10536 C10567 C10570 C10571 | | See Schedule 2 | See Schedule 2 |
[8] Schedule 2, entry for Mepolizumab
substitute:
Mepolizumab | C11841 C11848 C11950 | 1 | Sufficient for 32 weeks of treatment |
| C11842 | 1 | Sufficient for 24 weeks of treatment |
| C13864 C13865 C13890 | 1 | 5 |
[9] Schedule 3, entry for Abacavir
insert in numerical order after existing text:
| C13920 | | Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection Patient must be less than 13.00 years of age. Patient must be unable to take a solid dose form of this drug; AND The treatment must be in combination with other antiretroviral agents. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures |
[10] Schedule 3, entry for Mepolizumab
insert in numerical order after existing text:
| C13864 | | Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) Transitioning from non-PBS to PBS-subsidised supply - Grandfather arrangements Must be treated by a medical practitioner who is either a: (i) respiratory physician, (ii) clinical immunologist, (iii) allergist, (iv) ear nose and throat specialist (ENT), (v) general physician experienced in the management of patients with CRSwNP. Patient must have previously received non-PBS-subsidised treatment with this drug for this condition prior to 1 April 2023; AND Patient must have met all initial treatment PBS-eligibility criteria applying to a non-grandfathered patient prior to having commenced treatment with this drug, which are described below. Patient must be at least 18 years of age. Criteria for Grandfathered patients are that: (a) the diagnosis of CRSwNP was confirmed by at least one of: (i) nasal endoscopy, (ii) computed tomography (CT) scan; or from at least two physicians of the above mentioned prescriber types (b) the patient has undergone surgery for the removal of nasal polyps; or the patient has the written advice from at least two physicians of the above mentioned prescriber types demonstrating inappropriateness for surgery (c) the patient had, despite optimised nasal polyp therapy, at least two of: (i) bilateral endoscopic nasal polyp score of at least 5 (out of a maximum score of 8, with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity), (ii) nasal obstruction visual analogue scale (VAS) score greater than 5 (out of a maximum score of 10), (iii) overall symptom VAS score greater than 7 (out of a maximum score of 10) (d) the treatment was/is not used in combination with and within 4 weeks of another PBS-subsidised biological medicine prescribed for any of: (i) nasal polyps, (ii) uncontrolled severe allergic asthma, (iii) uncontrolled severe asthma (e) the patient had failed to achieve adequate control with optimised nasal polyp therapy which has been documented (f) the patient had a blood eosinophil count greater than or equal to 300 cells per microlitre in the 12 months preceding treatment. Optimised nasal polyp therapy includes: (a) adherence to intranasal corticosteroid therapy for at least 2 months, unless contraindicated or not tolerated (b) if required, nasal irrigation with saline Where the patient has a contraindication or intolerance to intranasal corticosteroid therapy, document the reasons for the contraindication or intolerance in the patient's medical file. The authority application must be made in writing and must include: (a) a completed authority prescription form, (b) a completed authority application form relevant to the indication and treatment phase (the latest version is located on the website specified in the Administrative Advice), (c) details (date of commencement and duration of therapy) of prior optimised nasal polyp medicine treatment, (d) details (date and treatment) of nasal polyp surgery; or (e) if applicable, details of surgical exception including serious comorbid disease (e.g. cardiovascular, stroke) making the risk of surgery unacceptable, (f) the eosinophil count and date, (g) two of the following, measured within the 12 months prior to non-PBS-subsidised treatment: (i) baseline bilateral endoscopic nasal polyp score, (ii) baseline nasal obstruction VAS score, (iii) baseline overall VAS score. | Compliance with Written Authority Required procedures |
| C13865 | | Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) Continuing treatment Must be treated by a medical practitioner who is either a: (i) respiratory physician, (ii) clinical immunologist, (iii) allergist, (iv) ear nose and throat specialist (ENT), (v) general physician experienced in the management of patients with CRSwNP. Patient must have previously received PBS-subsidised treatment with this drug for this condition; AND Patient must have both demonstrated and sustained an adequate response to this drug, defined as having at least one of: (i) an improvement in bilateral endoscopic nasal polyp score of at least 1.0 compared to the baseline level provided with the initial authority application, (ii) an improvement in nasal obstruction visual analogue scale (VAS) score of at least 3.0 compared to the baseline level provided with the initial authority application, (iii) an improvement in overall symptom VAS score of at least 2.5 compared to the baseline level provided with the initial authority application. Patient must be at least 18 years of age. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures |
| C13890 | | Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) Initial treatment Must be treated by a medical practitioner who is either a: (i) respiratory physician, (ii) clinical immunologist, (iii) allergist, (iv) ear nose and throat specialist (ENT), (v) general physician experienced in the management of patients with CRSwNP. Patient must have a diagnosis of CRSwNP confirmed by at least one of: (i) nasal endoscopy, (ii) computed tomography (CT) scan, with the results documented in the patient's medical records; OR Patient must have a diagnosis of CRSwNP from at least two physicians of the above mentioned prescriber types; AND Patient must have undergone surgery for the removal of nasal polyps; OR Patient must have the written advice from at least two physicians of the above mentioned prescriber types demonstrating inappropriateness for surgery; AND Patient must have, despite optimised nasal polyp therapy, at least two of: (i) bilateral endoscopic nasal polyp score of at least 5 (out of a maximum score of 8, with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity), (ii) nasal obstruction visual analogue scale (VAS) score greater than 5 (out of a maximum score of 10), (iii) overall symptom VAS score greater than 7 (out of a maximum score of 10); AND Patient must not have received PBS-subsidised treatment with a biological medicine for this condition; OR Patient must have had a 12 month break in PBS-subsidised treatment with a biological medicine for this condition; AND The treatment must not be used in combination with and within 4 weeks of another PBS-subsidised biological medicine prescribed for any of: (i) nasal polyps, (ii) uncontrolled severe allergic asthma, (iii) uncontrolled severe asthma; AND Patient must have failed to achieve adequate control with optimised nasal polyp therapy which has been documented; AND Patient must have blood eosinophil count greater than or equal to 300 cells per microlitre in the last 12 months. Patient must be at least 18 years of age. Optimised nasal polyp therapy includes: (a) adherence to intranasal corticosteroid therapy for at least 2 months, unless contraindicated or not tolerated (b) if required, nasal irrigation with saline Where the patient has a contraindication or intolerance to intranasal corticosteroid therapy, document the reasons for the contraindication or intolerance in the patient's medical file. The authority application must be made in writing and must include: (a) a completed authority prescription form, (b) a completed authority application form relevant to the indication and treatment phase (the latest version is located on the website specified in the Administrative Advice), (c) details (date of commencement and duration of therapy) of prior optimised nasal polyp medicine treatment, (d) details (date and treatment) of nasal polyp surgery; or (e) if applicable, details of surgical exception including serious comorbid disease (e.g. cardiovascular, stroke) making the risk of surgery unacceptable, (f) the eosinophil count and date, (g) two of the following, measured within the past 12 months: (i) baseline bilateral endoscopic nasal polyp score, (ii) baseline nasal obstruction VAS score, (iii) baseline overall VAS score. | Compliance with Written Authority Required procedures |
[11] Schedule 3, after entry for Romiplostim
insert:
Ruxolitinib | C13876 | P13876 | Grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) Continuing treatment Patient must have previously received PBS-subsidised treatment with this drug for this condition; AND Patient must have responding disease compared with baseline after 14 days of treatment demonstrated by either a: (i) partial response (ii) complete response. Must be treated by a haematologist; OR Must be treated by an oncologist with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation experience; OR Must be treated by a medical practitioner working under the direct supervision of one of the above mentioned specialist types. Response is defined as attaining a complete or partial response as assessed by Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Note that response is relative to the assessment of organ function affected by aGVHD prior to commencing initial treatment with ruxolitinib. (a) complete response is defined as a score of 0 for the aGVHD grade in all evaluable organs, indicating a complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of aGVHD, without the administration of any additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response or non-response of aGVHD. (b) partial response is defined as an improvement of one stage, in at least one of the evaluable organs involved with aGVHD signs or symptoms, without disease progression in other organs or sites and without the administration of additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response of aGVHD. The assessment of response must be documented in the patient's medical records. Tapering the dose of corticosteroids should be considered in patients with responding disease. Following successful tapering of corticosteroids, tapering the dose of ruxolitinib can be initiated. This drug is not PBS-subsidised if it is prescribed to an in-patient in a public hospital setting. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures - Streamlined Authority Code 13876 |
| C13877 | P13877 | Grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) Grandfather treatment (transition from non-PBS-subsidised treatment) Patient must have previously received non-PBS-subsidised treatment with this drug for this condition prior to 1 April 2023; AND Patient must have received systemic steroid treatment prior to initiation of this drug for this condition; AND Patient must be one of the following: (i) refractory to steroid treatment, (ii) dependent on steroid treatment, (iii) intolerant to steroid treatment; AND Patient must have responding disease compared with baseline after 14 days of treatment demonstrated by either a: (i) partial response (ii) complete response. Must be treated by a haematologist; OR Must be treated by an oncologist with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation experience; OR Must be treated by a medical practitioner working under the direct supervision of one of the above mentioned specialist types. Steroid-refractory disease is defined as: (a) progression after at least 3 days of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD; or (b) failure to achieve a partial response after 5 days at the time of initiation of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD. Steroid-dependent disease is defined as failed corticosteroid taper involving either one of the following criteria: (a) an increase in the corticosteroid dose to methylprednisolone of at least 2 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose of at least 2.5 mg/kg/day); or (b) failure to taper the methylprednisolone dose to less than 0.5 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose less than 0.6 mg/kg/day) for a minimum of 7 days. Steroid intolerance is defined as a patient developing an intolerance of a severity necessitating treatment withdrawal. Details of prior steroid use should be documented in the patient's medical records. Response is defined as attaining a complete or partial response as assessed by Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Note that response is relative to the assessment of organ function affected by aGVHD prior to commencing initial treatment with ruxolitinib. (a) complete response is defined as a score of 0 for the aGVHD grade in all evaluable organs, indicating a complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of aGVHD, without the administration of any additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response or non-response of aGVHD. (b) partial response is defined as an improvement of one stage, in at least one of the evaluable organs involved with aGVHD signs or symptoms, without disease progression in other organs or sites and without the administration of additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response of aGVHD. The assessment of response must be documented in the patient's medical records. Tapering the dose of corticosteroids should be considered in patients with responding disease. Following successful tapering of corticosteroids, tapering the dose of ruxolitinib can be initiated. This drug is not PBS-subsidised if it is prescribed to an in-patient in a public hospital setting. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures - Streamlined Authority Code 13877 |
| C13891 | P13891 | Grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) Grandfather treatment (transition from non-PBS-subsidised treatment) Patient must have previously received non-PBS-subsidised treatment with this drug for this condition prior to 1 April 2023; AND Patient must have received systemic steroid treatment prior to initiation of this drug for this condition; AND Patient must be one of the following: (i) refractory to steroid treatment, (ii) dependent on steroid treatment, (iii) intolerant to steroid treatment; AND Patient must have responding disease compared with baseline after 14 days of treatment demonstrated by either a: (i) partial response (ii) complete response. Must be treated by a haematologist; OR Must be treated by an oncologist with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation experience; OR Must be treated by a medical practitioner working under the direct supervision of one of the above mentioned specialist types. Steroid-refractory disease is defined as: (a) progression after at least 3 days of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD; or (b) failure to achieve a partial response after 5 days at the time of initiation of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD. Steroid-dependent disease is defined as failed corticosteroid taper involving either one of the following criteria: (a) an increase in the corticosteroid dose to methylprednisolone of at least 2 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose of at least 2.5 mg/kg/day); or (b) failure to taper the methylprednisolone dose to less than 0.5 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose less than 0.6 mg/kg/day) for a minimum of 7 days. Steroid intolerance is defined as a patient developing an intolerance of a severity necessitating treatment withdrawal. Details of prior steroid use should be documented in the patient's medical records. Response is defined as attaining a complete or partial response as assessed by Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Note that response is relative to the assessment of organ function affected by aGVHD prior to commencing initial treatment with ruxolitinib. (a) complete response is defined as a score of 0 for the aGVHD grade in all evaluable organs, indicating a complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of aGVHD, without the administration of any additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response or non-response of aGVHD. (b) partial response is defined as an improvement of one stage, in at least one of the evaluable organs involved with aGVHD signs or symptoms, without disease progression in other organs or sites and without the administration of additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response of aGVHD. The assessment of response must be documented in the patient's medical records. Tapering the dose of corticosteroids should be considered in patients with responding disease. Following successful tapering of corticosteroids, tapering the dose of ruxolitinib can be initiated. This drug is not PBS-subsidised if it is prescribed to an in-patient in a public hospital setting. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures - Streamlined Authority Code 13891 |
| C13892 | P13892 | Grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) Continuing treatment Patient must have previously received PBS-subsidised treatment with this drug for this condition; AND Patient must have responding disease compared with baseline after 14 days of treatment demonstrated by either a: (i) partial response (ii) complete response. Must be treated by a haematologist; OR Must be treated by an oncologist with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation experience; OR Must be treated by a medical practitioner working under the direct supervision of one of the above mentioned specialist types. Response is defined as attaining a complete or partial response as assessed by Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Note that response is relative to the assessment of organ function affected by aGVHD prior to commencing initial treatment with ruxolitinib. (a) complete response is defined as a score of 0 for the aGVHD grade in all evaluable organs, indicating a complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of aGVHD, without the administration of any additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response or non-response of aGVHD. (b) partial response is defined as an improvement of one stage, in at least one of the evaluable organs involved with aGVHD signs or symptoms, without disease progression in other organs or sites and without the administration of additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response of aGVHD. The assessment of response must be documented in the patient's medical records. Tapering the dose of corticosteroids should be considered in patients with responding disease. Following successful tapering of corticosteroids, tapering the dose of ruxolitinib can be initiated. This drug is not PBS-subsidised if it is prescribed to an in-patient in a public hospital setting. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures - Streamlined Authority Code 13892 |
| C13907 | P13907 | Grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) Initial treatment Patient must have received prior systemic steroid treatment for this condition; AND Patient must be one of the following: (i) refractory to steroid treatment, (ii) dependent on steroid treatment, (iii) intolerant to steroid treatment. Must be treated by a haematologist; OR Must be treated by an oncologist with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation experience; OR Must be treated by a medical practitioner working under the direct supervision of one of the above mentioned specialist types. The severity of aGVHD is defined by the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Steroid-refractory disease is defined as: (a) progression after at least 3 days of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD; or (b) failure to achieve a partial response after 5 days at the time of initiation of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD. Steroid-dependent disease is defined as failed corticosteroid taper involving either one of the following criteria: (a) an increase in the corticosteroid dose to methylprednisolone of at least 2 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose of at least 2.5 mg/kg/day); or (b) failure to taper the methylprednisolone dose to less than 0.5 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose less than 0.6 mg/kg/day) for a minimum of 7 days. Steroid intolerance is defined as a patient developing an intolerance of a severity necessitating treatment withdrawal. Details of prior steroid use should be documented in the patient's medical records. A patient must demonstrate a response 14 days after initiating treatment with ruxolitinib to be eligible for continuing treatment. Response is defined as attaining a complete or partial response as assessed by Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Note that response is relative to the assessment of organ function affected by aGVHD prior to commencing initial treatment with ruxolitinib. (a) complete response is defined as a score of 0 for the aGVHD grade in all evaluable organs, indicating a complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of aGVHD, without the administration of any additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response or non-response of aGVHD. (b) partial response is defined as an improvement of one stage, in at least one of the evaluable organs involved with aGVHD signs or symptoms, without disease progression in other organs or sites and without the administration of additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response of aGVHD. The assessment of response must be documented in the patient's medical records. This drug is not PBS-subsidised if it is prescribed to an in-patient in a public hospital setting. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures - Streamlined Authority Code 13907 |
| C13911 | P13911 | Grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) Initial treatment Patient must have received prior systemic steroid treatment for this condition; AND Patient must be one of the following: (i) refractory to steroid treatment, (ii) dependent on steroid treatment, (iii) intolerant to steroid treatment. Must be treated by a haematologist; OR Must be treated by an oncologist with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation experience; OR Must be treated by a medical practitioner working under the direct supervision of one of the above mentioned specialist types. The severity of aGVHD is defined by the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Steroid-refractory disease is defined as: (a) progression after at least 3 days of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD; or (b) failure to achieve a partial response after 5 days at the time of initiation of high-dose systemic corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day [or equivalent prednisone dose 2.5 mg/kg/day]) with or without calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of Grade II-IV aGVHD. Steroid-dependent disease is defined as failed corticosteroid taper involving either one of the following criteria: (a) an increase in the corticosteroid dose to methylprednisolone of at least 2 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose of at least 2.5 mg/kg/day); or (b) failure to taper the methylprednisolone dose to less than 0.5 mg/kg/day (or equivalent prednisone dose less than 0.6 mg/kg/day) for a minimum of 7 days. Steroid intolerance is defined as a patient developing an intolerance of a severity necessitating treatment withdrawal. Details of prior steroid use should be documented in the patient's medical records. A patient must demonstrate a response 14 days after initiating treatment with ruxolitinib to be eligible for continuing treatment. Response is defined as attaining a complete or partial response as assessed by Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria (Harris et al., 2016). Note that response is relative to the assessment of organ function affected by aGVHD prior to commencing initial treatment with ruxolitinib. (a) complete response is defined as a score of 0 for the aGVHD grade in all evaluable organs, indicating a complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of aGVHD, without the administration of any additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response or non-response of aGVHD. (b) partial response is defined as an improvement of one stage, in at least one of the evaluable organs involved with aGVHD signs or symptoms, without disease progression in other organs or sites and without the administration of additional systemic therapies for any earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response of aGVHD. The assessment of response must be documented in the patient's medical records. This drug is not PBS-subsidised if it is prescribed to an in-patient in a public hospital setting. | Compliance with Authority Required procedures - Streamlined Authority Code 13911 |