Health Insurance (prudential standard) determination No. 2 of 2023
Prudential Standard HPS 110 Capital Adequacy
Private Health Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2015
I, Helen Rowell, a delegate of APRA:
(a) under subsection 92(5) of the Private Health Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2015 (the PHIPS Act) revoke Health Insurance (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015, including Prudential Standard HPS 110 Capital Adequacy made under that Determination; and
(b) under subsection 92(1) of the PHIPS Act determine Prudential Standard HPS 110 Capital Adequacy, in the form set out in the Schedule, which applies to all private health insurers.
This instrument commences on 1 July 2023.
Dated: 24 May 2023
[Signed]
Helen Rowell
Deputy Chair
Interpretation
In this instrument:
APRA means the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
private health insurer has the meaning given in section 4 of the PHIPS Act.
Schedule
Prudential Standard HPS 110 Capital Adequacy, comprises the document commencing on the following page.
Capital Adequacy
Objectives and key requirements of this Prudential Standard This Prudential Standard requires a private health insurer to maintain adequate capital against the risks associated with its activities. The ultimate responsibility for the prudent management of capital of a private health insurer rests with its Board of directors. The Board must ensure that the private health insurer maintains an adequate level and quality of capital commensurate with the scale, nature and complexity of its business and risk profile, such that it is able to meet its obligations under a wide range of circumstances. The key requirements of this Prudential Standard are that a private health insurer must:
|
Responsibility for capital management
Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process
Prudential Capital Requirement
Previous exercise of discretion
Attachment A – Transitional Arrangements
2. This Prudential Standard applies to all private health insurers except where expressly noted otherwise.
3. A private health insurer must apply this Prudential Standard separately to each of its health benefits funds and its general fund, in addition to the private health insurer as a whole, unless otherwise noted. The term ‘private health insurer’ refers to the private health insurer as a whole. The term ‘fund’ refers to each health benefits fund and the general fund, unless otherwise noted.
4. This Prudential Standard applies to private health insurers from 1 July 2023.
5. Terms that are defined in Prudential Standard HPS 001 Definitions appear in bold the first time they are used in this Prudential Standard.
6. Capital is the cornerstone of a private health insurer’s financial strength. It supports a private health insurer’s operations by providing a buffer to absorb unanticipated losses from its activities and, in the event of such losses, enables the private health insurer to continue to meet its insurance obligations.
7. As a consequence of the key role played by capital in the financial strength of a private health insurer, the Board of a private health insurer must ensure that:
(a) the private health insurer as a whole; and
(b) each fund
has capital that is adequate for the scale, nature and complexity of its business and its risk profile, such that it is able to meet its obligations under a wide range of circumstances.
(a) be adequately documented, with the documentation made available to APRA on request; and
(b) be approved by the Board initially, and when significant changes are made.
9. A private health insurer’s ICAAP must be appropriate to the private health insurer’s size, business mix and the complexity of its operations.
10. A private health insurer that is part of a group may rely on the ICAAP of the group provided that the Board of the private health insurer is satisfied that the group ICAAP meets the criteria in paragraph 11 in respect of the private health insurer.
11. The ICAAP must include at a minimum:
(b) a strategy for ensuring adequate capital is maintained over time, including specific capital targets set in the context of the private health insurer’s risk profile, the Board’s risk appetite and regulatory capital requirements. This includes plans for how target levels of capital are to be met and the means available for sourcing additional capital where required;
(c) actions and procedures for monitoring the private health insurer’s compliance with its regulatory capital requirements and capital targets. This includes the setting of triggers to alert management to, and specified actions to avert and rectify, potential breaches of the regulatory capital requirements;
(d) stress testing and scenario analysis relating to potential risk exposures and available capital resources;
(e) processes for reporting on the ICAAP and its outcomes to the Board and senior management of the private health insurer, and for ensuring that the ICAAP is taken into account in making business decisions;
(g) an ‘ICAAP summary statement’ as defined in paragraph 12.
(a) a statement of the objectives of the ICAAP, the expected level of financial soundness associated with the capital targets and the time horizon over which the ICAAP applies;
(b) a description of the key assumptions and methodologies utilised by the private health insurer in its ICAAP, including stress testing and scenario analysis;
(c) triggers for reviewing the ICAAP in light of changes to business operations, regulatory, economic and financial market conditions, and other factors affecting the private health insurer’s risk profile and capital resources;
(d) a summary of the private health insurer’s policy for reviewing its ICAAP, including who is responsible for the review, details of the frequency and scope of the review, and mechanisms for reporting on the review and its outcomes to the Board and senior management;
(e) a description of the basis of measurement of capital used in the ICAAP, and an explanation of the differences where this basis differs from that used for regulatory capital; and
(f) references to supporting documentation and analysis, as relevant.
13. A private health insurer must ensure its ICAAP is subject to regular and robust review by appropriately qualified persons who are operationally independent of the conduct of capital management. The frequency and scope of the review must be appropriate to the private health insurer, having regard to its size, business mix, complexity of its operations, and the nature and extent of any changes that have occurred or are likely to occur in its business profile or its risk appetite. A review must be conducted at least every three years. The review must be sufficient to reach a view on whether the ICAAP is adequate and effective.
14. A private health insurer must, on an annual basis, provide a report on the implementation of its ICAAP to APRA (ICAAP report). A copy of the ICAAP report must be provided to APRA no later than three months from the end of the ICAAP annual reporting period to which it relates.
15. The ICAAP report must include:
(a) detailed information on current and three-year projected capital levels relative to minimum regulatory capital requirements and target levels for the private health insurer and each fund;
(b) detailed information on the actual outcomes of applying the ICAAP over the period, relative to the planned outcomes in the previous ICAAP report (including analysis of the private health insurer’s actual capital position relative to minimum regulatory capital requirements and capital targets and actual-versus-planned capital management actions);
(c) description of material changes to the ICAAP since the previous ICAAP report;
(d) detail and outcomes of stress testing and scenario analysis used in undertaking the ICAAP;
(e) a breakdown of capital usage over the planning horizon, as relevant, by material:
(i) business activity;
(ii) geographic spread of exposures; and
(iii) risk types;
(f) an assessment of anticipated changes in the private health insurer’s risk profile or capital management processes over the planning horizon;
(g) details of any review of the ICAAP since the previous ICAAP report, including any recommendations for change and how those recommendations have been, or are being, addressed; and
(h) references to supporting documentation and analysis as relevant.
(a) capital management has been undertaken by the private health insurer in accordance with the ICAAP over the period and, if not, a description of, and explanation for, deviations;
(b) the private health insurer has assessed the capital targets contained in its ICAAP to be adequate given the size, business mix and complexity of its operations; and
(c) the information included in the ICAAP report is accurate in all material respects.
17. In assessing the adequacy of a fund’s or a private health insurer’s capital base, attention must be paid not only to the risks it is likely to face, but also the quality of the support provided by various forms of capital. In assessing the quality of support provided by a particular form of capital, regard must be had to the extent to which it:
(a) provides a permanent and unrestricted commitment of funds;
(b) is freely available to absorb losses;
(c) does not impose any unavoidable servicing charges against earnings; and
(d) ranks behind the claims of policy holders and creditors in the event of the winding-up of the private health insurer.
18. Not all forms of capital meet these criteria equally. Due to the need to ensure that the capital base of a private health insurer provides adequate support for its activities, APRA imposes some restrictions on the composition of the capital base. The forms of capital deemed eligible for inclusion in the capital base, and the conditions as to their inclusion, are specified in Prudential Standard HPS 112 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital (HPS 112). HPS 112 defines the different categories and components of the capital base and the restrictions on the quality of the capital that is used to meet the required level of capital for regulatory purposes.
19. A fund’s or private health insurer’s balance sheet may contain certain assets (such as deferred tax assets, goodwill and other intangibles) that are acceptable from an accounting perspective. However, for supervisory purposes, such assets are either generally not available, or of questionable value, should the fund or private health insurer encounter difficulties. A private health insurer is therefore required to make certain adjustments in determining the capital base. Details of these adjustments are specified in HPS 112.
20. This Prudential Standard establishes a risk-based approach for measuring the capital adequacy of a private health insurer or its funds. This required level of capital for regulatory purposes is referred to as the Prudential Capital Requirement (PCR). The PCR is intended to take account of the full range of risks to which a fund or private health insurer is exposed.
21. A private health insurer must ensure that the private health insurer and each of its funds have a capital base, at all times, in excess of its PCR.
22. The PCR of a fund equals:
(a) a prescribed capital amount as determined by this Prudential Standard; and
(b) any supervisory adjustment determined by APRA under paragraph 41.
23. The prescribed capital amount for a private health insurer is the sum of the prescribed capital amounts of each of its funds.
24. The prescribed capital amount for a health benefits fund of a private health insurer cannot be less than $5 million. There is no minimum prescribed capital amount applicable to the general fund.
25. The PCR for a private health insurer is the sum of the PCRs of each of its funds (or such higher amount as determined by APRA under paragraph 41).
26. The prescribed capital amount is determined as:
(a) the Insurance Risk Charge; plus
(b) the Asset Risk Charge; plus
(c) the Asset Concentration Risk Charge; plus
(d) the Operational Risk Charge; less
(e) an ‘aggregation benefit’ as defined in paragraph 32 to 34; less
(f) tax benefits.
28. The Insurance Risk Charge relates to the risk of adverse financial impacts due to movements in existing and future claims, expenses, and other insurance risks such as adverse events. The method for determining the Insurance Risk Charge is set out in Prudential Standard HPS 115 Capital Adequacy: Insurance Risk Charge (HPS 115).
29. The Asset Risk Charge relates to the risk of adverse movements in the value of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet exposures. The method for determining the Asset Risk Charge is set out in Prudential Standard HPS 114 Capital Adequacy: Asset Risk Charge (HPS 114). Asset risk can be derived from a number of sources, including market risk and credit risk. For the purposes of this Prudential Standard and HPS 114, assets and exposures must be valued in accordance with the relevant reporting standards made under the Financial Sector (Collection of Data) Act 2001 (FSCODA).
30. The Asset Concentration Risk Charge relates to the risk resulting from concentrations in individual assets or large exposures to individual counterparties or groups of related counterparties. The method for determining the Asset Concentration Risk Charge is set out in Prudential Standard HPS 117 Capital Adequacy: Asset Concentration Risk Charge.
31. The Operational Risk Charge relates to the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. The method for determining the Operational Risk Charge is set out in Prudential Standard HPS 118 Capital Adequacy: Operational Risk Charge.
33. The aggregation benefit formula is:
where:
(a) ‘A’ is the Asset Risk Charge;
(b) ‘I’ is the Insurance Risk Charge; and
(c) ‘correlation’ is 20 per cent.
35. Recognition is able to be made for future shareholder tax benefits arising from losses occurring within the Insurance Risk Charge and Asset Risk Charge of a fund. A private health insurer may reduce the prescribed capital amount by the aggregate amount of any tax benefits that can be netted against deferred tax liabilities as specified in HPS 112.
36. The tax benefits from the Asset Risk Charge are the tax benefits resulting from scenarios modelled by the stress tests in HPS 114, reduced to allow for the reduction in Asset Risk Charge due to the asset risk aggregation formula. The tax benefits are therefore calculated as:
38. Overall tax benefits are to be reduced to allow for aggregation between the Asset Risk Charge and Insurance Risk Charge. Tax benefit aggregation reduction is calculated as:
where:
(a) ‘TA’ is the tax benefits from Asset Risk Charge in Paragraph 36;
(b) ‘TI’ is the tax benefits from Insurance Risk Charge in Paragraph 37; and
(c) ‘correlation’ is 20 per cent.
39. Tax benefits must only be recognised as a deduction from the prescribed capital amount if tax legislation allows them to be absorbed by the existing deferred tax liabilities. For this purpose, the deferred tax liabilities are those liabilities (if any) that remain after netting off the deferred tax assets and liabilities in the calculation of the deductions from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital in HPS 112.
40. If APRA is of the view that the prescribed capital amount does not produce an appropriate outcome in respect of a particular fund, or a private health insurer has used inappropriate judgement or estimation in calculating the prescribed capital amount, APRA may, in writing, adjust any aspect of the prescribed capital amount calculation for that fund. If such an adjustment is applied to a fund under this paragraph, a private health insurer must comply with the adjusted calculation.
(a) the amount of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital;
(b) the aggregate amount of any regulatory adjustments applied in the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital;
(c) the amount of Additional Tier 1 Capital;
(d) the aggregate amount of any regulatory adjustments applied in the calculation of Additional Tier 1 Capital;
(e) the amount of Tier 2 Capital;
(f) the aggregate amount of any regulatory adjustments applied in the calculation of Tier 2 Capital;
(g) the total capital base of the private health insurer derived from the items (a) to (f);
(h) the prescribed capital amount; and
(i) the capital adequacy multiple (item (g) divided by item (h)).
(a) the amount of the fund’s ‘net assets’, after applying any regulatory adjustments;
(b) the aggregate amount of any regulatory adjustments applied to the fund’s net assets;
(c) the amount of Tier 2 Capital held by the fund;
(e) the total capital base of the fund derived from the items (a) to (d);
(f) the fund’s prescribed capital amount;
(g) the components of the fund’s prescribed capital amount[1] specified in paragraph 26; and
(h) the capital adequacy multiple of the fund (item (e) divided by item (f)).
44. A private health insurer must publish the information specified in paragraphs 42 and 43 so that it is readily accessible to both policy holders and other market participants.
45. A private health insurer must not disclose any supervisory adjustment determined by APRA in accordance with paragraph 41.
46. A private health insurer must obtain APRA’s written approval prior to making any planned reduction in its capital base.
47. A reduction in a private health insurer’s capital base includes:
(a) a share buyback or the redemption, repurchase or repayment of any qualifying Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Additional Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital instruments issued by the company;
(b) trading in the private health insurer’s own shares or capital instruments outside of any arrangement agreed upon with APRA in accordance with HPS 112; and
(c) the aggregate amount of dividend payments on ordinary shares that exceeds a private health insurer’s after-tax earnings (as reported to APRA in the private health insurer’s statutory accounts) after taking into account any payments on more senior capital instruments, in the financial year[2] to which they relate.
48. A private health insurer proposing a capital reduction must provide APRA with a forecast showing the projected future capital position (including PCR) after the proposed capital reductions. The forecast should extend for at least two years.
49. A private health insurer must satisfy APRA that its capital base will remain adequate for its future needs after a proposed reduction.
50. A private health insurer may take into account materiality when calculating its capital base and prescribed capital amount or the capital base and prescribed capital amount of each of its funds. Particular values or components are considered material to the overall result of a calculation if misstating or omitting them would produce results likely to be misleading to the users of the information.
51. A private health insurer must inform APRA as soon as practicable of:
(a) any breach or prospective breach of its PCR or the PCR of any of its funds;
(b) any significant departure from its ICAAP;
(c) any significant adverse changes in the capital base or PCR of the private health insurer or any of its funds; or
(d) other necessary notification events under the Act.
The notice must include any remedial actions taken or planned to be taken to address the situation and the timing of these actions.
52. APRA may, by notice in writing to a private health insurer, adjust or exclude a specific requirement in this Prudential Standard in relation to that private health insurer.
53. From 1 July 2023, the ICAAP requirements in paragraphs 8 to 16 apply to
(a) SFIs; and
54. For all private health insurers that are non-SFIs and are not subject to an APRA determination under paragraph 53(b), the ICAAP requirements in paragraphs 8 to 16 apply from 1 July 2025.
55. Subject to paragraph 2 of Attachment A, a private health insurer must notify APRA by 30 June 2023, and provide the data (using a template provided by APRA) described in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) of Attachment A by 30 September 2023, if they adopt the transitional arrangements set out in Attachment A. A private health insurer that adopts the transitional arrangements set out in Attachment A may only do so until 30 June 2025.
56. A private health insurer must contact APRA if it seeks to place reliance, for the purposes of complying with this Prudential Standard, on a previous exemption or other exercise of discretion made by APRA under a previous Prudential Standard.
3. The Transitional Adjustment is:
Where:
(a) A is the capital adequacy requirement calculated under paragraph 9 of the version of Prudential Standard HPS 110 as determined on 26 June 2015 less balance sheet liabilities, as at 30 June 2023
(b) B is the prescribed capital amount calculated under this standard as at 30 June 2023
(c) C is the prescribed capital amount calculated at the most recent reporting date under this standard (prior to the transitional adjustment being applied)
(d) X is a percentage which reduces over time, as set out in Table 1
Table 1: Schedule for X in the Transitional Adjustment
Quarter commencing | X |
1 July 2023 | 100.0% |
1 October 2023 | 87.5% |
1 January 2024 | 75.0% |
1 April 2024 | 62.5% |
1 July 2024 | 50.0% |
1 October 2024 | 37.5% |
1 January 2025 | 25.0% |
1 April 2025 | 12.5% |
[1] This item must separately identify any transition amount approved by APRA under the capital standards.
[2] ‘Financial year’ means the last four quarters for which the private health insurer was required to submit quarterly returns in accordance with reporting standards made under FSCODA to APRA preceding the date of the proposed dividend.